Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Frank Küster wrote: >> Michael Piefel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Package: texlive-latex-extra >>> Version: 2005.dfsg.2-2 >>> Severity: normal >>> >>> texlive-latex-extra claims to contain beamer, but does not. >> >> Ah, interesting. It's texlive-latex-recommended that Recommends: >> latex-beamer. >> >> One part of the fix is going to be: > > Wait a second. IIRC moving beamer from texlive-latex-extra to > texlive-latex-recommended was part of the TPM reorganisation done some > time ago. It simply does not make sense to have the (old) prosper in > texlive-latex-recommended while the currently used beamer or powerdot > are in texlive-latex-extra. Hence I think it is only the description > that has to be fixed.
Thanks for noticing. So that makes --- tpm2deb.cfg (Revision 1941) +++ tpm2deb.cfg (Arbeitskopie) @@ -529,6 +529,9 @@ blacklist;tpm;pgf;* depends;texlive-full;pgf (>= 1.01.dfsg.1-1), latex-beamer (>= 3.06.dfsg.1-0.1), latex-xcolor (>= 2.09-1) recommends;texlive-pictures;pgf (>= 1.01.dfsg.1-1) +# beamer is in collection texlive-latex-extra, but prosper is in +# *-recommended. This doesn't make sense: Let beamer be +# recommended by texlive-latex-recommended recommends;texlive-latex-recommended;latex-beamer (>= 3.06.dfsg.1-0.1) recommends;texlive-latex-recommended;latex-xcolor (>= 2.09-1) # For this part of the "bug". Regards, Frakn -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
