Hi ! Le mardi 7 novembre 2006 06:55, Yaroslav Halchenko a écrit : > Nice to see someone is ITPing it... Didn't want to compile with free > java... I was about to at least file ITP myself whenever I saw > your ITP ;-) I have a letter of correspondence from Morgan which might > be of some value - I will forward it to you with next email
Well, licencing is no longer an issue for jbiswatcher.. But the source include some binary material that needed to be replaced by source. I have managed to remove some part that were not necessary, but there is still a Regex class that is needed. Big issue there is that while the author of the class, located there: http://www.javaregex.com/ claims that the licence is the Lesser Gnu Public License, the source lacks some classes source, in particular in some Unicode*.class See http://www.javaregex.com/binaries/patbinfree153.jar and http://www.javaregex.com/binaries/patsrcfree153.jar So there is two options: those missing sources are somewhere under a compatible licence, and we can follow, or they are taken from a non-free java project, and the licencing is invaling and we are stuck.. I have mailed the author of the Regex classes about this issue, but did not get any answer yet.. Romain -- We should really love each other In peace and harmony Instead, instead, we're fussing and fighting Like we ain't supposed to be, tell me why
