On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 17:44:56 +0100
Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 15:06:43 +0100, Ricardo wrote in message 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 
> > severity 397268 important
> > tags 397268 moreinfo unreproducible
> > thanks
> > 
> > El Mon, 06 Nov 2006 04:20:44 +0100
> > Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> >   
> > > Package: sylpheed-gtk1
> > > Version: 1.0.6-4
> > > Severity: critical  
> > 
> >   Wrong, read http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer.en.html#severities
> >   
> > > Justification: causes serious data loss
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ...found this in my email box:  
> > 
> >   That doesn't serve much. Unless you have a way to reproduce it, this
> > can be caused also by disk corruption (due some power failure or
> > similar event).  
> 
> ..well, I can at least confirm it is reproducable, I found 4 more of
> these concatenated mails.  Can we rule out any of Sylpheed, Procmail,
> Fetchmail or Exim?  I dunno exim, just found I have these:

  By reproducible I mean you can make Sylpheed to generate another one of
these corrupted mails. Having found very few others only reinforces the disk
corruption theory. 

  If you run Sylpheed daily more or less the same way and the bug is really
there, it should be generating corrupted mails in a regular basis.

  Anyway, I wonder why you don't use the sylpheed package instead, which is
the current GTK+2 upstream-maintained version. Any reason? :)

  regards,
-- 
 Ricardo Mones
 http://people.debian.org/~mones
 «Don't go around saying the world owes you a living. The world owes you 
 nothing. It was here first. -- Mark Twain»

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to