On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 09:39 -0600, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: > > there is nothing invalid with the last two lines of the > debian/copyright. perhaps it would be better to reference the lastest > valid license for the software as opposed to the oldest valid license. i > dont know. is there some policy that governs this? >
That was just what I thought, I talked to a DD and there is nothing invalid about it. So keep it the way you like it. This actually means that you could close this bug, sorry for bothering you. Greetings, Lukas -- Lukas Fittl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
