On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 02:47:15PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > But clearly if you're just reporting this strangeness now, months after the > package was uploaded, the package isn't actually unusable. So why should > this be grave?
OK, you may be right, but this certainly is strange! > BTW, the packages in sarge shipped the same way, with no ill effects... Really? I would have thought that such important packages would have been looked at more closely, and that such a strangeness would have been spotted before. But then why have a libperl5.8 package at all? Nicolas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
