Daniel Rodriguez Garcia wrote: [..] > > what's the rationale for setting "the property volume.ignore=true for > local devices as a security measure" ?
If we don't set volume.ignore=true for local devices, each partition will be mountable by everyone who gets access to HAL (everyone in group plugdev). But I already wrote that in an earlier email. > Perhaps it would good to improve coordination between > gnome-volume-manager and hal packages (just to make sure maintainers for It's not an g-v-m issue, as I already wrote earlier. It's a gnome-vfs issue. Did you notice that the g-v-m and hal maintainer is the same person? > either package are aware of new modifications, or to agree on a global > policy for managing / showing / hiding volumes / devices...) > > You may also add a README explaining this kind of modifications (which > may "conflict" with other packages and current desktop behaviour) and > how to override or solve them (if possible). You are kidding me. Nobody reads README.Debian nowadays anymore. If something is not working people complain instantly. Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
