Hi, Sorry but it's not true. U can close the bug if it's fixed by the developpers but with the tag "moreinfo" it's false because I give all information about this bug to the responsable. I paste the 3 mails here and 2 attachements files:
Le samedi 30 juillet 2005 à 16:16 -0300, Guilherme de S. Pastore a écrit : > severity 320587 important > tag 320587 moreinfo > tag 320587 unreproducible > quit > > Hello, Hi, > > UNLOADALL doesn't seem to be a valid command in xchat 2.4.3. Perhaps > it's provided by some external broken plugin you loaded? Also, I tried > to unload modules in the few different ways I could think of, and xchat > didn't crash. When i try to unload script from menu (Fenetres > Greffons et Scripts) i have this message: Unloading individual perl scripts is not supported. You may use /UNLOADALL to unload all Perl scripts. Unloading individual perl scripts is not supported. You may use /UNLOADALL to unload all Perl scripts. > > In addition, you used "causes data loss" as justification for the grave > severity. What kind of data loss did/could this cause? > I use "causes data loss" because when xchat crash with (/unloadall command) i can resume my receiving dcc files. > I am, therefore, lowering the severity and tagging this bug as > 'moreinfo' and 'unreproducible' while we wait for a reply from you. > > Thanks in advance, Thanks --- Hassan Le mercredi 03 août 2005 à 17:41 -0300, Guilherme de S. Pastore a écrit : > [ Err... because of some stupid mistake, this message stayed in my > outgoing mail queue and was not sent ] > > Hi, Hello, > > sorry, unloadall is a command provided by the Perl interface module, > which is supposed to unload all Perl stuff at once, so, yes, this can be > xchat's fault. > > What does running xchat from the command line or through strace tell > you? Is it a Segmentation fault? If so, could you please provide a > backtrace, so I can look deeper into it, as I cannot reproduce the > problem on my machine? Yes i have a Segmentation fault: --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) --- +++ killed by SIGSEGV +++ I join a strace log for my xchat session (i have change my real password for nickserv). > > Thanks, Thanks for you ;) Hello, I send u a gdb backtrace in this attachement. --- Hassan Le mercredi 03 août 2005 à 19:14 -0300, Guilherme de S. Pastore a écrit : > Actually, I meant a gdb backtrace, sorry for not being clear enough. > Hope you don't mind providing it too =) > > Regards, > Le jeudi 02 novembre 2006 à 07:50 -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System a écrit : > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > #320587: xchat: Xchat close when i use /unloadall, > which was filed against the xchat package. > > It has been closed by Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is > unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate > message then please contact Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> by replying > to this email. > > Debian bug tracking system administrator > (administrator, Debian Bugs database) > > pièce jointe message de courriel > > -------- Message transféré -------- > > De: Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > À: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sujet: xchat: Xchat close when i use /unloadall > > Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 16:34:51 +0100 > > Client de messagerie: Evolution 2.6.3 > > > > Tagged "moreinfo" since Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:16:38 -0300. That is more > > than "a reasonable (few months) timeframe". Anyone, feel free to reopen > > and explain why. > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=320587;msg=9 > > http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#tags > > > >
