Op vr, 03-11-2006 te 10:33 +0000, schreef Ross Paterson: > On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 03:21:49AM +0100, Arjan Oosting wrote: > > > Since you already have a separate package for HaXml-1.13.2, you probably > > > don't want to have it bundled (it's the same version, anyway). > > > > I could do that indeed. But hugs does not ship the same version, the > > bundled version is the development version 1.17. Any reason why this is > > done? > > Ah, so it is. The pattern with Hugs has been to ship with snapshots > of all library packages from CVS or darcs, but the intention is to move > to using released tarballs once packages start releasing independently. > Might as well do that with HaXml now.
Hmm, I am wondering whether I would still need to ship libhugs-haxml-bundled as the people might expect to get HaXml 1.17 instead of HaXml 1.13.2 when using Hugs. I still want to keep HaXml 1.13.2 in etch so upgrading all my HaXml is no option for now. > As for GLUT: it's fine on arm, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc and sparc, > but fails with "undefined symbol: glutStrokeMonoRoman" on alpha, amd64, > hppa, ia64, m68k and s390. In freeglut-2.4.0 I find > > struct freeglutStrokeFont glutStrokeMonoRoman ; > extern void* glutStrokeMonoRoman; > > which certainly looks wrong. I have next to no C skills, so please enlighten me on how to fix this if you can :-) I will upload my current packaging to experimental so we can get it through NEW. It will probably be to late to get this in etch as the freeze will be happening soon. Greetings Arjan
signature.asc
Description: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal ondertekend
