On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:22:48PM -0800, Tom Epperly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My package, babel, builds everything statically and dynamically for the > sake of thorough testing. Everything seems to work fine if libxml2.la > includes -lz an -lm. We test it on other platforms where libxml2.la > includes the dependencies, and libtool does the right thing. I guess I > don't see the point of not have the dependencies in the .la.
It adds unnecessary dependencies when building dynamically. What is the point of building static binaries that include libxml2 anyway ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
