On Tuesday 31 October 2006 19:42, paul cannon took the opportunity to say: > Have you considered simply putting this package in non-free? When and if > the legal questions are further resolved, transition it to main.
Hmm, yes, I think so, although the naming issue has since been cleared. The biggest (only) problem is the choice of venue clause, which can be considered to make the package unsuitable for distribution - at least theoretically. -- Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpajLkq9ptXw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
