On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 14:39 -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 21:26 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Once the new source package has been uploaded, the obsolete binary
> > package will be removed semi-automagically. Since the current source
> > package in unstable still builds the package, it won't get removed until
> > the new source is in the archive.
[...]
> Thanks for the clarification.  The developer's reference was not
> explicit in this regard; it was inferred, but not explicit.

Better documentation is on my to-do list. :)

> Should I just close/retract this bug then?

It doesn't make a huge amount of difference either way imho; if it stays
open it'll get closed once I notice that the old package has been
removed. Conversely since no specific action needs to be taken, there's
also no reason not to close it now.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to