package azureus tag 395379 wontfix thanks On 10/26/06, Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ...
Either way, I can't see it being an actual problem for anyone. Perhaps the policy needs to be adjusted a bit for programs (vs. libraries).
Hello Jon, I prefer to use the upstream name of Azureus2.jar. I think the Java policy should probably differentiate between programs and libraries in this case. It's important for libraries to have the version number in the file name so that multiple versions of the library can exist on the system, but the same cannot be said for programs. So, I don't plan to fix this bug. I would rather see the policy changed. Cheers, Shaun -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
