On Tue, Oct 24 2006, at 16:35 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > reopen 394657 > severity 394657 wishlist > tag 394657 = confirmed > thanks > > On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 22 2006, at 23:44 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > > On Sun, 22 Oct 2006, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > > > So I'd suggest an option to force the usual fsck no matter whether the > > > > machine is running on AC or battery -- perhaps via some setting in > > > > /etc/default/. > > > > > > Is anything wrong with the /forcefsck file? > > > > > > *** 1: > > > > /forcefsck does not seem to be documented anywhere on Debian when > > searching like this: > > I don't know where it came from, either. But it has been there for a long > time. And I did *ask* what was wrong with the /forcefsk file for your > needs, which you answered in this email. > > > Whereas I was suggesting an option to set up a check, for the time of > > booting, to see whether the last shutdown was clean and, if it wasn't, > > perform the check. > > I see. I didn't understand what you wanted. Maybe that's the reason why I > asked if /forcefsck was not appropriate? > > That said, this is a valid concern, and one I fell should be honoured. > Since you have closed the bug report, I am reopening it.
:) OK, so I probably simply misunderstood your one-liner "Is anything wrong with the /forcefsck file?" as something like: "Why should you need more than the /forcefsck file?" Sorry if I was interpreting too fast .... Best Regards Wolfgang -- Wolfgang Pfeiffer: /ICQ: 286585973/ + + + /AIM: crashinglinux/ http://profiles.yahoo.com/wolfgangpfeiffer Key ID: E3037113 http://keyserver.mine.nu/pks/lookup?search=0xE3037113&fingerprint=on -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
