Package: bacula-fd
Version: 1.38.11-6
Severity: normal
python2.3 is quite obsolete now. In an attempt to remove it from the
system, I realized bacula-fd depends on python2.3. Shouldn't it better
depend on python (>= 2.3) or python2.4 instead (the latter if it won't
work with 2.5 due to incompatible changes) ?
Soeren.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18.1-rc1-sonne-alu
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages bacula-fd depends on:
ii bacula-common 1.38.11-6 Network backup, recovery and verif
ii libacl1 2.2.41-1 Access control list shared library
ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libgcc1 1:4.1.1-16 GCC support library
ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8c-3 SSL shared libraries
ii libstdc++6 4.1.1-16 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libwrap0 7.6.dbs-11 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra
ii python2.3 2.3.5-15 An interactive high-level object-o
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13 compression library - runtime
bacula-fd recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
