On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 02:33:06PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> Hi Jeroen,
>
> [removing pdp11-unix-v{5,6,7}]
>
> On Saturday 12 March 2005 00.00, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > prefereably by first mailing this to the
> > wnpp bugs,
>
> Not clear what you mean here - first just suggest the removal just inside
> the O: bugs? Doesn't get any audience at all.
Eh, all debian-wnpp subscribers, that is, a significant bunch of QA
people etc, who know when and how to reassign to ftp.d.o. The most
important thing is though getting the history of the reasons to removal
in the bug report.
> > and when you get no negative feedback in a few weeks or so,
> > you can reassign & retitle appropriately.
>
> I cc:ed the bug report to d-devel, there was no negative feedback - no
> feedback at all, indeed. On IRC I received a 'go ahead' from at least one
> person (not that this signifies much ;-)
>
> So I close this (298030) bug and retitle/reassign the wnpp ones now? Wait
> any longer?
d-d isn't usefully archived (that is, per issue), like a buglog is, for
later review by QA and afterwards FTP-team.
Yeah, retitle & reassign the wnpp would be best, supplying a reason.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
