Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#391838: udev seems to both require and conflict with hotplug?,
which was filed against the udev package.
It has been closed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri).
Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is
unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate
message then please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) by replying
to this email.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: Bug#391838: udev seems to both require and conflict with hotplug?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri)
Date:
Mon, 9 Oct 2006 01:09:04 +0200
To:
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received:
(at 391838-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2006 23:09:47 +0000
Return-path:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received:
from attila.bofh.it ([213.92.8.2] ident=postfix) by spohr.debian.org
with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GWhli-000798-Kc for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Oct 2006 16:09:14 -0700
Received:
by attila.bofh.it (Postfix, from userid 10) id ADE8F5F73A; Mon, 9 Oct
2006 01:09:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received:
by wonderland.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2B89F1BF51; Mon,
9 Oct 2006 01:09:04 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gj572EiMnwbLXET9"
Content-Disposition:
inline
In-Reply-To:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent:
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
X-Spam-Checker-Version:
SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on
spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status:
No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Oct 08, Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# dpkg-reconfigure udev
udev requires hotplug support, not started.
If CONFIG_HOTPLUG is defined then /proc/sys/kernel/hotplug is supposed
to exist.
I do not know what you did to your system, but I do not believe that
this is the result of a bug in the udev package.
if [ ! -e /proc/sys/kernel/hotplug ]; then
echo "udev requires hotplug support, not started."
return 1
fi
Thanks for the tip, I may have made a mistake when compiling the kernel.
May I suggest changing the message to "udev requires
/proc/sys/kernel/hotplug"?
This will make it obvious that the problem is with a file, not some
missing package.
Helge Hafting
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
