Andreas Beckmann schrieb: > Willi Mann wrote: > >>> 4ECDB11F8004: client=host.example.com[8.1.2.1], sasl_method=CRAM-MD5, >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Should I report sasl_username or sasl_sender? What does make more sense? >> Sorry, I don't have any postfix installation available. > > Looking at the code again ... I think sasl_username is the senseful one > (and sasl_sender is only used as a fallback if no sasl_user is available).
Hi! I've reduced my fix by the nss-mysql fixes because I don't want a bug report like "logwatch deliberately ignores important error message". Just because the "error" message is now useless doesn't mean it's useless in the future. Please use ignore.conf as described in the docs (HOWTO-Customize..) But the rest is still there. Can you please test if my fixes work for you? (Especially the postfix part) Upload is intended for tomorrow. http://pkg-logwatch.alioth.debian.org/apt/pool/main/l/logwatch/logwatch_7.3.1-3~1_all.deb Willi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
