On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 09:58:56 +0200 Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 07:35:28PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > if you could foolproof the full manual I would really appreciate > > > it > > > > Well, I'm (slowly) reading it and I am reporting bugs whenever I see > > something that doesn't look right... > > I don't know if that fits your definition of foolproofing... :p > > Should have said proofreading (<bunk>)
Ah, that's it! I think that what I am doing is actually proofreading the full manual... > > > Take into account that I am *not* a security guru, even though I am > > interested in the topic. > > Well, so much the better, if you find a section confusing because it > got into too much mambo-jambo I would appreciate if you would report > that too. Good, if I find one, I'll file a bug report. > > > > (but use the version published at the > > > website, as it is built from the latest CVS sources and might be > > > more up-to-date than the version distributed in the harden-doc > > > package). > > > > I am reading the online HTML version at > > http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/index.en.html > > > > I hope it's the one you're referring to... > > > > Yep, that's the one. Fine, I see that it has a version number in the footer (currently 3.9): should I go on mentioning *that* number in the Version: pseudo-header of future bug reports? -- But it is also tradition that times *must* and always do change, my friend. -- from _Coming to America_ ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpoyVdpLiF6Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
