On Thu, Oct 12, 2006, Steve Langasek wrote: > > It was mere code checking. I assumed that since /usr/local was the > > administrator's sandbox, one could assume anything could be found there > > and did not bother looking at old versions of console-common. I agree > > that the code might never be triggered in real life, though. > > Downgrading as such.
Uh? "a package must not rely on the presence or absence of files or directories in `/usr/local' for normal operation." It seems to me that console-common relies on old files no longer being present in order not to fail. -- Sam. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
