to, 2006-10-12 kello 21:55 -0700, Steve Langasek kirjoitti: > > to be REMOVED: > > libgl1-mesa-dev libgl1-mesa-dri libgl1-mesa-glx x-window-system > > x-window-system-core xlibmesa-dri xlibmesa-gl xlibmesa-gl-dev xorg > > to be INSTALLED: > > autoconf2.13 fftw3-dev libgl1-mesa-swx11 libgl1-mesa-swx11-dev > > libglu1-xorg-dev > > > To remove xorg just to build grass? Somewhat exaggarated, IMHO. > > That doesn't make it a serious bug in grass just because you choose not to > install the build-dependencies. > > Though since grass doesn't appear to be building against libOSMesa, it > should be fixed to use one of the less-conflicty implementations of > libgl1-dev.
Yes, I think this was the point I was trying to make; not really knew how to put it, though. > > And the current grass binary dependes on libgdal1-1.3.2, which is the > > current version in testing, not 1.3.1, which is required by > > the source package. Would be nice to have the control file that was used > > to build the current testing packages, not some age-old > > ones. > > What are you talking about? The current version of the package > build-depends on libgdal1-1.3.2-dev. Considering the high general quality of Debian, the mistake must have been on my side; an apt-src remove grass with apt-src install grass did the trick, and suddenly the control file was updated... Don't have an explanation for that, though. -- Harri Kiiskinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
