Eddy Petrișor wrote:
[this is just a "are we sure that what we're doing is necessary" mail]
Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 12 octobre 2006 à 10:19 +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti a écrit :
I really suggest including the clearlooks engine into the gtkdfb udeb
right now, test it and make sure it works correctly in the case this
bugs couldn't be fixed in time for RC1.
In all cases this would have to be a different udeb, as clearlooks is
included in the gtk2-engines source.
It also means revamping the gtk2-engines build process so it's not
trivial, but certainly feasible.
My idea was including clearlooks engine dfb flavour into
libgtk-directfb-2.0-0-udeb package.
I know this is not very clean, but as a temporary solution, given also
the time of the release we are , could be an acceptable solution.
Something similar [1] was also done to provide the g-i the dfbinfo tool.
I have seen that Denis Barbier was able to apply the hicontrast theme to
G-I just fine without the engine. Is the engine really necessary? (I
never understood what is the pupose of those, so I could use some light
on the subject).
I guess it was because that theme uses the libpixmap engine, which is
already part of gtk source package.. or not?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
