On Monday 09 October 2006 18:15, John Goerzen wrote: > On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 05:57:00PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > Finally, yes Bacula does use SEGFAULT to generate tracebacks when it aborts, > > because it is the only portable way of doing so (the Unix abort() is not > > portable). > > > > This is not a bug and should be closed. > > Thank you for the clear explanation. I have closed the report. > > Just to clarify for the submitter: Kern is saying that this is not a bug > unless you also get segfaults in the test mode. If you try it and do > get segfaults there, let me know, and we'll pursue it further.
Yes, thanks for the clarification -- you are correct. The Bacula conf file scanner has never been what I would call "super good", but it should not seg fault on a valid conf file or it is a bug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
