On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 10:21:10PM +0200, Christian Reiniger wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 August 2005 22:12, Christian Reiniger wrote:
> > On Wednesday 10 August 2005 21:50, MJ Ray wrote:
> > > Christian Reiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 09 August 2005 12:24, Per Marker Mortensen wrote:
> > > > > Dotsrc staff wrote:
> > > > > > * Rsync access is provided from rsync.mirrors.dotsrc.org , i.e.
> > > > > > a *different* host than mirrors.dotsrc.org/ftp.dk.debian.org .
> > > > > > We hope this is no problem.
> > > > >
> > > > > It seems to be the same host, and seems to be working fine:
> > > >
> > > > Only because we don't have the hardware to separate them yet.
> > > > Please treat them as distinct hosts -- they certainly will be as
> > > > soon as we can manage it.
> > >
> > > I think that means it should have two entries in the mirrors list and
> > > won't be ftp.dk.debian.org - can anyone confirm/reject that, please?
> > >
> > > See http://www.debian.org/mirror/official
> >
> > We *can* also tell our firewall to do port forwarding from
> > mirrors.dotsrc.org:rsync (aka ftp.dk.debian.org:rsync) to
> > rsync.mirrors.dotsrc.org:rsync . It's just not the most efficient thing
> > to do...
>
> Correction: I just talked with some people who actually *know* our
> firewall setup (yeah, sorry..), and got word that the port forwarding
> would be no problem at all. So -- forget about rsync.mirrors.dotsrc.org
> and simply use the main host for rsync.
Firstly, I'm sorry for the ridiculously slow reply time on this.
Since the other two candidates (Uni-C and Telia) don't actually qualify,
and you guys also have a good history, I'm going to have ftp.dk.d.o
assigned to you. Thanks.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
