On Thursday 05 October 2006 11:16, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: > May i proceed committing the updated version of the patch proposed for > this bug?
No, sorry. No changes should be needed in rootskel for g-i. I will try to create a patch that has the same end result, but is limited to rootskel-gtk. Cheers, FJP
pgpJUB1MGV82A.pgp
Description: PGP signature
