-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>>>>> "Rene" == Rene Mayrhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rene> Am Wednesday 04 October 2006 18:37 schrieb Paul Wouters:
>> openswan series 2.4 is our "stable" tree. Development is
>> happening in 2.5.x (git #public) and 2.6.x (git #ocf). Debian
>> stable should upgrade their openswan to 2.4.x
Rene> I talked to the release manager. This won't happen. But the
Rene> next Debian stable release will have openswan 2.4.6.
Should we change our versioning system?
I admit in hindsight that our .x and .x.y releases are not all
of equivalent stability.
We can not afford to the kind of "LTS" that people might like with
a lot of back patches to previous versions. Our customers are not
paying us for stability --- they are paying for new features.
- --
] Bear: "Me, I'm just the shape of a bear." | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Xelerance Corporation, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/mcr/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys
iQEVAwUBRSQOkoCLcPvd0N1lAQJwxwf/dt0Pn58/x5QA4RRBa4H+BxuIJxxko+3A
J8dVAJJEsEOXrF3zoGy25mocUZdh+tuMFgkhFEBgpV8dxSkbaWbK5D0cul1u0kCB
Qd8M5QyOojteLaupg3FwS+Si+BZnFZb+0Dnb5ssi1QTNTbNIh5bLRKZ1/FwSm22t
aA8/L1P6PP36Rgcl7lMDIIYge5H47NdHUxNSyJc2i3Q/Fx57/UD9Q8vM2ECqiXoX
pIVfuuDwKgkuMAzGytdQQ9NWJ4dBBUS4LUgKRhuRV8iyTYIS2uhJQp1ZNQmLMM4r
Ua+zAaK/tigXwF4xaIzj1WK++UhjQMkW8Q2EPqzvAfMET4gHfWR7yQ==
=Z1iK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
