Jose Luis Rivas Contreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Goswin von Brederlow escribió: >> Jose Luis Rivas Contreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: >>>> This should be fixed in the latest release, but I didn`t test it very much. >>>> >>>> Rakshasa >>>> >>>> On Mon, September 25, 2006 04:18, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote: >>>> package rtorrent >>>> tags 384949 upstream >>>> thanks >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I'm letting know the upstream about this issue. >>>> >>>> Jaris please see [1] for further information about the problem. >>>> >>>> Thanks and Cheers! >>>> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=384949 >>>> Furu-Furu-Furu Moon! >>> Hi, are you having this problem yet? upstreams have sent an email >>> telling this is probably fixed in the last release (0.6.2) >>> >>> Thanks and Cheers!! >> >> I still see the problem but not rtorrent stalling on it >> currently. Could just be the torrent. >> >> What was fixed? The forgetting or the stalling part? >> >> MfG >> Goswin >> > I don't know wich part exactly, I think both cause he says that this > probably should be fixed by last version. Have you seen any of this in > rtorrent? Do you think is problem of the torrent a not of the app? > > Thanks and Cheers!!
I now think it is a combination of things: 1. clients sometimes forget requests, they skip ahead. 2. rtorrent tries to reget those holes after a while (which seems to work much better now) 3. super-seeder hide chunks they have served If you combine those 3 it seem that rtorrent looses a source for the chunk with the hole and if there aren't any other sources the block will remain incomplete and stall the download till the superseeder resets itself. At least that is what it looks like now. I'm not sure what to do about this. It isn't really a bug in rtorrent but we can't fix every other client out there. Rtorrent could better remember that some client did have that chunk and re-request it even if that client now says it isn't available anymore. I.e. ignore the super-seeder hack. Unless the super-seeder will NAK such requests. MfG Goswin