4, <flame> Epiphany is just too ugly (call it "consistent" if U wish).
I'd never offer it to our users. </flame>
If it's ugly, that must be because of your desktop theme. It's difficult
to make a more neutral look than epiphany's.
Standard theme, untouched.
5, <rumors> Epiphany imposes web compatibility problems even in cases
where Firefox dosen't have any problem. </rumors>
Bullshit.
Mr. almighty, You've probably tested them all. Why don't You publish it?
7, Solving problems with webpages. Firefox is well-known and many webs
tend to be compatible with, I can use the stronger position. However, I
could hardly argue with the "Epiphany". What is it? Can we eat it? Or is
it related to some religion?
It uses the same engine - freed from a number of bugs by the xulrunner
maintainer.
Explain that to someone who is happy to know single more browser beside
of IE.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]