4, <flame> Epiphany is just too ugly (call it "consistent" if U wish). I'd never offer it to our users. </flame>

If it's ugly, that must be because of your desktop theme. It's difficult
to make a more neutral look than epiphany's.

Standard theme, untouched.

5, <rumors> Epiphany imposes web compatibility problems even in cases where Firefox dosen't have any problem. </rumors>

Bullshit.

Mr. almighty, You've probably tested them all. Why don't You publish it?


7, Solving problems with webpages. Firefox is well-known and many webs tend to be compatible with, I can use the stronger position. However, I could hardly argue with the "Epiphany". What is it? Can we eat it? Or is it related to some religion?

It uses the same engine - freed from a number of bugs by the xulrunner
maintainer.

Explain that to someone who is happy to know single more browser beside of IE.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to