Hi Richard,
2006/9/28, Richard Laager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 23:51 -0400, Jason Spiro wrote:
> It would be great if there were "virtual groups" for idle/away
> buddies, do-not-disturb buddies, and offline buddies. You would not be
> able to add people to these fake groups, of course.
Given your previous comments about sorting by status and log size, could
you clarify how you'd expect this to work in combination with sort by
status? Also, why isn't sort by status sufficient?
I closed this bug already. It was opened by mistake.
I would like sort by status then log size because then all my
most-talked-to buddies who are available will be onscreen at once,
making it quicker to check my contact list to see who's there. I
assume such a feature would be useful to others as well, though
without a voting feature it's hard to tell if this is true without
going on IRC and asking the crowd.
Cheers,
Jason
--
Jason Spiro: computer consulting with a smile.
I also provide training and spyware removal services for homes and businesses.
Call or email for a FREE 5-minute consultation. Satisfaction guaranteed.
416-781-5938 / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / MSN instant chat: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
