Hi Guenter, On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 04:33:34PM +0200, geiger wrote:
> I have read through the bug-report and I have to admit that I am > surprised. Swami is a soundfile editor and therefore it can be > used to generate soundfonts, so in Steve's word a "cut-and-dried" > case. For my own edification, could you please explain how I would create a sound font in swami? I could only find options to import existing sound fonts. > There are also soundfonts at freepats: > http://freepats.opensrc.org/sf2/rhodes/, for example. And freepats is also packaged, so if it's compatible, I see no reason why fluidsynth should be regarded as inappropriate for main (or even buggy, if it can also be used with swami to create new fonts). Do any of the other TC members disagree? If not, I'll draft a quick resolution upholding the maintainer's decision and then we can get back to arguing about ndiswrapper :-) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
