forwarded 385798 http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64508 thanks
Hi, Am Sonntag, 24. September 2006 23:05 schrieb Bernd Schubert: > I think I found the reason why the bytecode interpreter is not used, see here: > http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=17880 > > Now, there are two ways to resolve this bug: > > 1.) Quick'n dirty. Simply replace FT_LOAD_TARGET_LIGHT in > vcl/source/glyphs/gcach_ftyp.cxx by FT_LOAD_TARGET_NORMAL or > FT_LOAD_TARGET_LCD or FT_LOAD_TARGET_LCD_V (if recompiling wouldn't take >8h > on Opteron 242, it would be easy to test which gives best results). Hmm. Can't you do it as you know what you expect to have? :) You don't need to do a full rebuild for every change ;-) - you only have to build once (assume the default or with one of the changes), and then just can do: 1) cd <whatever>/vcl 2) . ../Linux<whatever>.sh 3) build 4) copy the lib into your install 5) *try* 6) repeat from 2) > 2.) Take the latest patch from > http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64508 and adjust it, so that > it applies to openoffice-2.0.4. > From the point of the user wishes and user config probably the best, but its > clearly not a simple replace patch and might be buggy. > > Which one do you prefer? Given the timeframe and the maybe-riskyness of i64508 I'd prefer 1.) Regards, Rene -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
