> > I suggest also double-checking that the *priority* is > > double doh! will do. > > > adapted. Displaying errors at priority low or medium makes them very > > likely to *not* be displayed so you might really consider whether the > > priority is adapted....or if the note itself is really useful, of > > course...:-) > > > > If these error notes are really something that your users should see > > when the error occurs, setting their priority to "high" is probably > > better. > > Well, I don't think the message itself is all that useful, that is why > it was a note of low priority. What I'm concerned about is all the > wasted translation effort if the notes are completely removed... > > I'm seriously thinking about completely removing them now...
Actually, I read some writings by Joey Hess stating that error templates are displayed *whatever* the debconf priority settings could be..:-) So, indeed, what I previously mentioned might be wrong. About wasted translation effort, well, there will be some...but just think about the effort you would save, avoiding future translators to work on the template..:)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
