On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 08:54:05PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Nothing depends on libpthread2 any more, so is there any reason to keep > this package in the achive?
Actually, it's that nothing has depended on libpthread2 ever. This is a new binary package recently added to the pth source package. ... it's also named wrong, because the binary it ships is libpthread.so.20, not libpthread.so.2. > If the maintainer hasn't responded in a week or two, this bug could be > reassigned to ftp.debian.org and turned into a removal request. Dropping pth as a whole would break a number of packages that depend on the traditional libpth interface. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
