On Sat, 2005-03-12 at 18:10 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > People on #debian-devel disagree too.
Try it. I did. > > > > I would actually prefer it if /etc/hotplug/.run/ were not included in > > > > the package but were handled the way ifupdown handles /etc/network/run/. > > > Why? > > So that /etc/hotplug/.run can be a symlink to /dev/shm/hotplug . > Please send a patch (which should also move /etc/hotplug/.run/ to > /dev/shm/). I don't mind preparing a patch. Note that /dev/shm/ can't be used on devfs systems, which is one reason why we have been making the location of run directories configurable by means of symlinks. -- Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
