On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 11:25:21AM +0200, Amaya wrote: > reassign 388159 installation-reports > retitle 388159 installation-reports: Please depend on lspci > severity wishlist > thanks
Hi Amaya, ... > Rick Thomas wrote: > > Package: base > > Please do not file bugs against the base pseudo-package. > It is there just as a catch-all-I-dunno-where-to-file-this-report for > users that can't really tell what package is giving them problems. > All the bug reports here get reassigned to the right package. it was Frans who suggested this, and doing ping-pong of bug reporters is hardly user friendly, especially given the rather crude kind of response Guy and Rick are getting. > > Since the install-report template requests the output of lspci, I > > would think you -- of all folks -- would want it as part of the base > > system. > > Imho, installation-reports should depend on, or recommend lspci if it > requires its output for the report. Installation-reports is always installed, right ? or would there be need of another bug report against another yet-to-be-determined package for inclusion of lspci in either the base system or the server task ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
