Le dim 17 septembre 2006 01:27, James Vega a écrit : > On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 11:31:51PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > you are supposed to pull vim, or one of its variant, that is > > explicitely depending on vim-common (for all of them) *AND* from > > vim-gui-common if the variant supports gvim. > > > > so basically, there is no bug. we could maybe add a dep > > vim-gui-common on vim-common, but I think I recall there was a > > problem with that. I'll try to figure out which one it was... > > This change happened when I updated the dependencies so the Vim > packages are binNMU safe. Since vim-gui-common is arch: all, adding > a dependency on vim-common would prevent that. We can just change > the packaging so /u/s/d/vim-gui-common is a directory with the same > same contents as vim-common (or just the minimum required by policy).
why that ? you could a non == relation, like:
vim-common (>= ${source:Version}) which would be correct, and the vim
variant will impose a more constrained one anyway.
wouldn't it just as simple ?
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOO http://www.madism.org
pgp1yO5TPYkLZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
