Hi Yann, On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 01:34:58PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote: > Well, I feel "normal" to be a bit low (this is why I did not feel > necessary to split the bugreport at first): if the package is not split, > tulip will only be installable on machines with the non-accelerated (or > glide only) version of libgl1, which is quite bad. Even if I split > tlprender out of the tulip package, installing the tlprender package > would require to remove libgl1-glx first.
> It does not violate any policy that I know of, but seems at least > "important" to me. I have no particular attachment to the severity; in one sense the bug seemed to me to be "wishlist", so I just sort of split the difference. :) But if you think it should be upgraded to important, go ahead. My main purpose was to split the bug report, because I'm preparing an NMU that will address the RC aspect of this bug report (broken shlibs), but fixing the other is non-trivial due to the maintainer's home-grown system for installing files into packages. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
