> The X people assured me it wasn't being used. I'm not reintroducing the > flag. I don't understand why you'd want -n.
*I* was indeed following the bug reporter suggestion with the main intent of ifxing translations along with the original sentence and do it The Right Way. Of course, as you say "lspci -n" is not useful for the purpose here. Recommending "lspci" alone or "(lspci ; lspci -n)|sort" as we do for D-I would be a better option. Waiting for the final XSF advice and I'll commit one of these. I actually do not insist deeply to commit changes myself...but I insist on translations (debian/po/*po and debian/po/templates.pot) not being broken which means that they should be modified on the fly before running debconf-udpatepo (also note that debconf-updatepo should not be run on a sarge machine).
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
