On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 06:30:17PM +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote: > On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Nicolas Duboc wrote: > > I think a better solution is to support, or at least detect, previous > >file format. > > You're basically right, but I'm not going to because I don't have the will to > write and debug the code. I should perhaps > instead have bumped the version number to 2.4.
It would not have change anything to the users' config file update. > I get very little communication from non-Debian users, so I'm not so worried > about them: my main focus is Debian users > upgrading from sarge to etch and getting a shock. > > I think that for zile users this note is pretty important. I could certainly > put something in the README. I documented the .zilerc to .zile migration of 2.2 in the NEWS.Debian file. The config file changes about the backup system are also documented there. I think that this note plus the change of behavior of zile (and eventually the error message as the one Robert has seen) will be enough for the user to understand the config file migration. -- Nicolas Duboc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgp9aNxRv9BEY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
