On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 06:08:11PM +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote: > On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Nicolas Duboc wrote: > > > I'm not completely convinced that Zile can be considered as an > >alternative for emacs but I'm going to ask to emacsen maintainers. > > I nearly wrote this too, but then reconsidered: it certainly is (or aims to > be) a strict subset, and if subsetting is allowed > in alternatives (as seems to be the case with nvi) then zile fits the bill. > But maybe it's too small a subset...
Yes, it may well be a valid candidate as an emacs alternatives. em3m, from the e3 package, is a smaller editor with a smaller subset of emacs features but it is registered as an emacs alternative. I have submitted the question to debian-emacsen [1] [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-emacsen/2006/09/msg00015.html -- Nicolas Duboc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpJITl1Lie74.pgp
Description: PGP signature
