Hi all! On Mon, 04 Sep 2006, Frank Küster wrote: > > In the recent upgrade to KDE 3.5.4 kdegraphics seemed to require texlive > > packages, but these failed with an error that a file was owned by two > > packages, and that I should remove texlive. I attempted to do so. > > 1. Why does or did kdegraphics require texlive, and is not satisfied > with tetex?
kdegraphics never required texlive, not even provide alternative deps on texlive. Eg. kdegraphcs depends on kdvi which in turn recommends tetex-bin. > > List of ls-R files > > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 2006-08-27 23:16 /usr/share/texmf-texlive/ls-R -> > > /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVE > > 2. It is strange that there is only one ls-R file. Please send us the > output of Probably because most other packages are removed, and mktexlsr has never been called. > > ###################################### > > Config files > > total 20 > > drwx------ 2 ross ross 256 2006-06-26 09:18 Desktop > > drwxr-xr-x 3 ross ross 256 2006-02-15 21:18 download > > drwx------ 2 ross ross 48 2006-02-14 10:42 Mail > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1828 2006-03-31 21:14 pci > > -rw------- 1 ross ross 0 2006-04-16 15:21 postponed > > drwxr-xr-x 2 ross ross 80 2006-06-17 16:16 RCS > > -rw------- 1 ross ross 8612 2006-07-22 12:13 sent > > -rw-r--r-- 1 ross ross 850 2006-06-25 23:18 testspam > > 3. I've never seen such an output in a texlive bugreport, but then I > haven't seen lots of them, being focused on teTeX until recently. Is > this expected? This comes from an unchecked code in the bug script, where texmf.cnf fmtutuil.cnf updmap.cnf is NOT found: for i in texmf.cnf fmtutil.cnf updmap.cfg ; do f=`kpsewhich --format='web2c files' $i` ls -l $f >&3 done Already changed in the svn depot. > > texlive recommends no packages. > > 4. All texlive packages that do not directly depend on tex-common should > have a reportbug control file that has a "report-with: tex-common" > statement, and maybe more packages. Good idea, will do this... > 5. As far as I understood, dvipdfmx calls mktexlsr unconditionally, this > should probably be a separate bug. Yes, should be. Best wishes Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
