Hi

debian-legal would be a good place to ask on as well.

Regards,

// Ola

On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 02:30:36PM +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Sep 2006, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> 
> >On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 11:45:14AM +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> >
> >>BTW, this brings up one vexed point: the info docs are under the GFDL,
> >>not the GPL. I'll check that the code examples are (as the GFDL itself
> >>suggests) under a suitable license; I can't find anything in the docs
> >>themselves, so I'm posting to glibc-bugs.
> >
> >That can be a problem however. On the other hand it is such
> >a small thing that ut may not be copyrighted at all. But if you
> >can find this as a gpl:ed (or similar) licensed, it would be
> >really nice.
> 
> I've posted to glibc-bugs and am awaiting an answer. I don't know if the 
> glibc maintainers (who after all checked all the licenses, I guess), or 
> in general, debian-legal, or some other Debian list, could help too?
> 
> -- 
> http://rrt.sc3d.org/ | pirate, n.  a politician of the seas (Bierce)
> 
> 

-- 
 --------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/  [EMAIL PROTECTED]                     Annebergsslingan 37      \
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED]                 654 65 KARLSTAD          |
|  +46 (0)54-10 14 30                  +46 (0)70-332 1551       |
|  http://www.opal.dhs.org             UIN/icq: 4912500         |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36  4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
 ---------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to