Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,
> I do, and the patch that Julien suggests looks reasonable and correct to me. Note that the patch will only help users who do not upgrade their system regularly. The harm is already done for the others :( To help the ones who upgrade regularly (and haven't purged the ntp-simple/ntp-refclock packages yet), ntp should depend on the dummy ntp-simple and ntp-refclock packages, so as to clear the maintainer scripts from the previous packages. The dependency would need to be kept for some time, which probably means releasing Etch with an ntp package depending on 2 empty packages. There's no good solution to this problem, it seems :/ Damage-control time ... JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
