Le jeudi 31 août 2006 à 18:50 +0200, hatori a écrit : > (gdb) thread apply all bt > > Thread 2 (Thread -1228551248 (LWP 4349)): > #0 0xb75e6e19 in poll () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > #1 0xb77451a9 in g_main_context_check () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > #2 0xb7745537 in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > #3 0xb7864a90 in link_set_io_thread () from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0 > #4 0xb775f5df in g_thread_create_full () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > #5 0xb77bf0bd in start_thread () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 > #6 0xb75f08fe in clone () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 > > Thread 1 (Thread -1224939840 (LWP 4324)): > #0 0xb77c4361 in __write_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 > #1 0xb768dd5e in _X11TransGetMyAddr () from /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 > #2 0xb768d8bf in _X11TransWrite () from /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 > #3 0xb76931c6 in _XSend () from /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 > #4 0xb769414c in _XEventsQueued () from /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 > #5 0xb767fd33 in XPending () from /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 > #6 0xb79b966d in gdk_event_send_client_message_for_display () > from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 > #7 0xb79b9761 in gdk_event_send_client_message_for_display () > from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 > #8 0xb774465d in g_main_context_prepare () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > #9 0xb7744e25 in g_main_context_check () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit--- > #10 0xb7745537 in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 > #11 0xb7b23141 in gtk_main () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 > #12 0x08062863 in main () > #0 0xb77c4361 in __write_nocancel () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
Is it the backtrace with gamin installed? At that moment, gnome-panel was using 100% of the CPU? Is the backtrace always the same if you retry later? -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
