On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 10:06:47PM +0200, Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 2006-08-31 Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 09:31:34AM +0200, Christian Hammers > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 2006-08-31 Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > > > mozplugger is just great and works well with firefox and not only > > > > > > mozilla-1.7. As I used firefox for months now without knowing of > > > > > > mozpluggers existence I feld that there should be at least a > > > > > > Recommend to it. > > > > > > > > > > I think Suggests is more appropriate. > > > > > > > > I we start to do so, why not add as well all firefox extensions ? I > > > > don't think that's the best thing to do... > > > > > > Because mozplugger is more an architecture like "extensions" or > > > "plugins". > > > > Mozplugger is a plugin that embeds external applications. It's no > > different from the totem plugin, for example. > > Technically correct, but mozplugger displays much more like postscript and > pdf which makes it at least "the best available". And as there are no > "extensions" available as .deb, they stand not to discussion which leaves > "mozplugger or not mozplugger" as choice for us.
To cite a (very) few: mozilla-venkman mozilla-livehttpheaders mozilla-checky mozilla-diggler mozilla-tabextensions mozilla-ctxextensions mozilla-stumbleupon mozilla-bonobo ... Sure, there are no "extensions" available as .deb. > So decide yourself what would be the most beneficial to our users (esp. the > non-gurus) without making packaging or policy problems. > > I would vote for a strong recommend but if you think that many users be > better off without mozplayer make it a suggest or leave it be... I'm not convinced having mozplugger installed by default (that's what a recommend would do) would be a really good idea. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
