On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 07:37:11AM -0300, Damián Viano wrote: > reopen 369445 > tags = patch > thanks, control just let's keep my stupid mistake amongst us, ok? > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 08:33:14PM -0300, Damián Viano wrote: > > Perfect, with your instructions I could reproduce and fix this bug. I > > didn't need to dig so much on who was using the NULL pointer returned > > by gdk_font_load, since the right fix imho is to avoid overriding the > > right font in case of not finding the new font appropriate. So this would > > just use the default font in the gtk theme if the setted font can't be > > loaded. > > Sory, I made a *stupid* mistake, in that the font gets unref'ed even if > it's not changed. This would probably throw the same error than before, > just not so soon, efectivly hidding the bug! Do I rock or what?
I already applied the patch and tested for both cases. Anyway, I see what you are fixing. I'll apply this one as well and reupload gmoo. Thanks. > Anyway, here's a decent patch, on the house ;-P You do know you that you are sending reverse patches, don't you? ;) Thanks for solving this, kind regards, Paul -- Student @ Eindhoven | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Technology, The Netherlands | JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux <<< | GnuPG key ID: 0x50064181
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
