On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:19:59PM +0100, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: > (a) It's still not serious because of the actual consequences of this, > namely a few missing README files.
Should this not be considered a misbuilt package? It seems to me that it should; which means that the build-dependencies are incomplete, and this is a sev: serious bug. > (This is why generally the maintainer, who actually knows what's going on, > is supposed to be the one to decide the severity, right?) Most of the severities are well-defined, and where the RC severities are concerned it's normally the release team who decides whether a given bug fits the description. This looks to me like a case where the package is allowed to misbuild, which I would normally regard as RC. > (b) I've already uploaded a fix, so this is in any case moot. Except that the upload was at low priority, so has not yet reached testing. :) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
