> > Have you talked with them about this? > > Not really; I've replied to the rejection, but they didn't react. > > > They usually only run stable versions of apt on ftp-master, afaik. > > That's what I would expect them to do, and what I probably would do in > their shoes. (Being conservative about central critical infrastructure > and all that.)
As I can understand that the ftpmaster aren't eager to change to a non-stable apt, wouldn't the simplest solution be to add an epoch of "1" to the package? Or am I missing something here? Thijs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
