tags 381901 pending
thankyou

Hi,

> I didn't know this, good to know, but it's not the point because the 
> above command is the last one in the script, which exits with the return 
> code of the command, i.e. 1 if the link doesn't exist.

Ah, sure, you're right, I'd forgotten about the last-command-determines-
exit-status rule.

> I have successfully patched the post-rm script by replacing the "&&" 
> construct through an "if" one, and the package purged flawlessly.
> But it's easy to test: install mt-st, remove the above link and try to 
> --purge the package. I can reproduce it, see the end of the mail.

I'd rather append a "exit 0" to the script to evade the last-command rule,
because a) I like the &&-approach and I'd have to b1) wait for debhelper
to change its behaviour or b2) abandon debhelper and write it myself if
I wanted to introduce the "if" approach.


Thanks for your report!

Jan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to