On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 07:49:13PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Hello Nicolas, > On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 07:39:19PM +0200, Nicolas François wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 10:21:14PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > > -"option will not expand the architecture wildcards. Command finishes > > > with an " > > > +"action will not expand the architecture wildcards. Command finishes > > > with an " > > > > I've not fixed these ones. > > Well, "-e" is an action, so why should "option" be written here?
Applied. > > > Why is linux-alpha a wildcard? > > > "E<lt>kernelE<gt>-E<lt>cpuE<gt>. Examples: linux-any, linux-alpha, > > > any-i386, " > > > > It doesn't sounds like a wilcard to me. I don't know whether it's a typo > > or if linux-alpha should be removed. > > Ok. If you do decide to remove it, either update the german > translation or let me know so I can do it. Nothing done > > I propose > > "Check if an architecture is equal to the current architecture or a given > > one:" > > > > The second could be: > > "Check if the current architecture or an architecture provided with -a are > > Linux systems:" > > Sound very fine with me, please apply. Applied Here is the updated PO. Kind Regards, -- Nekral
dpkg-architecture_de.po.bz2
Description: Binary data
