On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 08:28:31AM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > That would be better. I am not the fuse maintainer (he is be'ing Cc'ed), > > but normaly I would request at least a GPG signed mail for license > > changes. > > I just realized that the problem doesn't exist, since the fuse _library_ > is under LGPL (since version 1.1). The kernel module is obviously > GPL, but nobody links against that except the kernel.
I wonder how could I miss that. I adopted fuse when the newest version in Debian was 1.0, and probably updated it and overlooked new license for library. I'll upload new package with correct copyrights. Sorry. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
